He thought of them to be so good formed as to belong to the transition from the Eolithic to the Paleolithic, the Strepyan, based on his procedure, the primitive Chellean in French utilization. in response to Rutot, convinced specimens ‘bear rudimentary strains of intentional paintings, as can be present in trial makes an attempt. ’ In others ‘the intentional paintings is of a better personality. ’Another ‘has been applied as a scraper, of which it has the nature. ’ one other lengthy piece ‘bears on its finish makes an attempt at paintings, for creating a dagger or piercer. ’ one other is ‘a excellent racloir [side scraper], rather well worn from use and retouched. ’ one other is ‘a excellent grattoir [end scraper], both good worn from use and retouched. ’ ultimately there's a first-class ‘throwing stone. ’ Mr. Rutot considers the morphology of the flints of Belle-Assise as attribute of intentional paintings, surpassing the straightforward retouching of typical flakes present in eoliths, and staining the looks of actual intentional manufacture of certain software varieties within the sunrise of the Paleolithic. proven the sequence accumulated by way of Mr. Commont, from either Belle-Assise and Picardy, Rutot gave an analogous analysis, even though truthfully acknowledging he had difficulty with the Eocene age of such items. ” If one accepts Breuil’s rationalization that every one of the specimens from BelleAssise have been shaped by way of geological pressures, as verified by way of a couple of examples of crudely chipped flakes present in touch with dad or mum blocks of flint, then, after all, Rutot comes off very badly. you can actually merely finish that the unwitting Belgian geologist foolishly authorised evidently flaked flints as gadgets of human manufacture. yet, as we've got proven, Breuil’s tried clarification doesn't thoroughly account for all the implementlike items present in the early Eocene beds at Belle-Assise and in different places. Breuil (1910, p. 287) wrote: “Although components of damaged blocks of flint are usually discovered nonetheless mendacity in shut connection, this isn't the guideline, and one doesn't usually locate such situations, in particular within the sand that is much less compacted. ” it should hence look that examples of flakes mendacity subsequent to their dad or mum blocks (Figures three. 20, three. 21) weren't all that quite a few. additionally, the flakes present in touch with the mum or dad blocks didn't very heavily resemble the various different specimens that Breuil known as “pseudotools” (Figures three. 22, three. 23). specifically, the flakes involved with mum or dad blocks didn't in any respect resemble the 2 overdue Paleolithic kind implements discovered at Belle-Assise (Figures three. 24, three. 25). for that reason the idea that each one the specimens proven to Rutot have been produced through traditional forces is unwarranted. The presence of some clearly damaged flints at Belle-Assise doesn't rule out the prospect that many others, comparable to implements, have been in truth made via people, in particular because the latter type exhibit extra complex styles of chipping than noticeable within the few specimens demonstrably damaged by means of geological strain. it really is, hence, fairly attainable that Rutot’s decisions concerning the specimens proven to him by means of Capitan have been solely right, and that Breuil had inadvertently been the discoverer of a brand new Eolithic within the Eocene.