David G. Myers and Paul J. Bach, dialogue results on MilitarismPacifism: A attempt of the gang Polarization speculation, J. character & Soc. Psychol. 30 (1974): 741, 741–47. 27. workforce polarization of the authoritarian juror. approximately 280 scholars have been labeled as “high” or “low” authoritarians in keeping with a survey after which requested to hear a homicide trial. the scholars have been requested to pass judgement on the defendant’s guilt and punishment after which put in sixperson juries. As anticipated, juries with excessive authoritarian jurors reached extra to blame verdicts and sought harsher consequences than low authoritarian jurors. furthermore, the decision swap among prediscussion and postdiscussion used to be extra major for top authoritarians than for low authoritarians. —Robert M. Bray and Audrey M. Noble, Authoritarianism and judgements of Mock Juries—Evidence of Jury Bias and workforce Polarization, J. character & Soc. Psychol. 36 (1978): 1424, 1424–30. 28. Polarization and age. members from 3 age teams (adolescents, youths, and adults) have been assessed both separately or with friends of an identical age for his or her threat personal tastes via a mixture of questionnaires and a game. The examine discovered that these in peer teams made 168 APPENDIX riskier judgements than the participants and likewise that staff polarization lowered (but didn't disappear) with age. —Margo Gardner and Laurence Steinberg, Peer impact on possibility Taking, probability choice, and dicy choice Making in early life and maturity: An Experimental examine, Developmental Psychol. forty-one (2005): 625, 625–35. Acknowledgments i've been engaged on this subject for a few years, and it's a excitement to thank the numerous acquaintances and co-workers who've helped. it truly is a sarcasm to claim that the publication couldn't were refrained from them. thank you first to my coauthors at the a number of tasks that experience trained this e-book. On juries and punitive damages, i used to be privileged to paintings with Daniel Kahneman and David Schkade; the collaboration was once amazingly instructive and nice enjoyable. On judicial balloting, David Schkade used to be a superb collaborator, and my former scholars Lisa Ellman and Andres Sawicki have been priceless coauthors at the paintings that eventually emerged. extra lately, Thomas Miles and i've labored on a number of reviews of judicial vote casting and regulatory coverage. The Colorado research was once a made from an test concerning Reid Hastie and (yet back) David Schkade. at the theoretical foundations, I benefited from an excellent collaboration with Edward Glaeser. i'm extra thankful than i will say to each the sort of actually fantastic acquaintances. through the years, i've got additionally benefited from the reviews, criticisms, and objections of many colleagues. For specified 170 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS thank you, I unmarried out Martha Nussbaum for numerous discussions, for unfailingly excessive criteria, and for beneficiant and worthy assist in getting the arguments instantly. thank you besides to Eric Posner, Richard Posner, Richard Thaler, and Adrian Vermeule—all tremendous colleagues and associates, and folks of actually remarkable kindness and generosity.