Orestes takes a distinct tack. He asks the Furies why they'd didn't punish Clytemnestra, which might have made it pointless for him to shed her blood. They answer that they punish merely those that kill a blood relative—a son who kills his mom, yet now not a spouse who kills her husband. 32 This answer units the level for Apollo, Orestes’ suggest, to convey the crushing rebuttal that assures Orestes’ acquittal. 33 Apollo says that Orestes will not be a blood relative of Clytemnestra, simply because a mom is simply the incubator of the father’s baby; the daddy is the sole (we could say genetic) dad or mum. 34 the trendy reader, incredulous, asks how the Greeks may have didn't observe the actual resemblance among moms and youngsters, which indicates (without any want to know whatever approximately genetics) that the mummy is as a lot a mother or father because the father. however it ­doesn’t express this. Environmental in addition to genetic components verify the structure of an organism. The flavor of wine is suffering from the soil during which the grapes are grown. Apollo’s argument isn't really stable biology, however it is apt in its dramatic context. It ­comes correct after the Furies have stated they punish basically the laying off of kin’ blood. This drawback at the Furies’ jurisdiction isn't really 32. So why ­didn’t they cross after Agamemnon for killing his daughter? it's not that i am acutely aware that this question is replied wherever within the trilogy. 33. both by means of a tie vote, if the jury comprises 11 Athenians plus Athena, or by means of a majority vote, if the jury involves an excellent variety of Athenians plus Athena—it is doubtful which. 34. See Lesley Dean-Jones, Women’s our bodies in Classical Greek technological know-how 149 n. eight (1994). Apollo’s genetic thought, as Dean-Jones issues out, seems to were a minority view even in fifth-century bc Athens, even though it was once later ­adopted through Aristotle. just like the humbling of the Furies (who are girl) on the finish of Eumenides, and the presentation of Clytemnestra because the sole killer of Agamemnon (rather than together with Aegisthus, as in so much prior remedies; see Gantz, notice 27 above, at 664–675), Apollo’s concept turns out meant to disparage any declare that ­women may need to the rights of a citizen, rights unrelated to the function of a girl as a breeder. Cf. James Redfield, “Homo Domesticus,” within the Greeks 153, 162 (JeanPierre Vernant ed. 1995): “Marriage, by way of turning the sexual energy of ­women to the top of inheritance, restrains that energy and therefore secures either the civic order and a correct relation with the god. ” In like vein, Carla Spivack, “The lady can be Out: a brand new examine the legislations in Hamlet,” 21 Yale magazine of legislation and the arts 31 (2008), argues subterranean subject in Hamlet, re­flect­ing a backlash opposed to Queen Elizabeth I’s lengthy reign, is the impropriety of ­women’s exercise political strength. ninety two  l  l a w a n d l i t e r a t u r e arbitrary, end result of the challenge that homicide in the family members creates for a procedure during which revenge is a familial responsibility. A supernatural supplier is required to avenge such murders, and within the Oresteia the Furies are that service provider, comparable to the plague despatched by way of Apollo in Oedipus Tyrannus.