His rules have been offered in a presidential lecture to the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia (Breuil 1934). Breuil is usually criticised this day for over-interpreting the facts and occasionally for imagining greater than was once fairly there, yet for the main half this account used to be perceptive and soundly researched. It incorporated a few rules that have given that fallen from favour—he observed many designs as being drawn from the human face, and he sought for the resource of such a lot motifs within the artwork of Iberia—but his uncomplicated method was once extra really appropriate. It was once ‘to workforce [the designs] in successive sequence, classing them both of their process or their relative positions’ (ibid, 289) and it integrated clever observations at the superimposition of alternative motifs in Irish passage graves. He additionally sought to set up the relative dates of specific motifs through trying to find ameliorations of weathering. For our reasons an important aspect in his paper is the comparisons that he drew among the carvings present in megalithic tombs and people on typical outcrops. He observed them as a continuum and didn't distinguish sharply among the 2 teams. regrettably, his interpretation was once absolutely colored through his simple thesis that such carvings depicted human positive factors, in order that every now and then he appears to be like much less involved to check those motifs with each other than he's to hyperlink them either to a completely hypothetical prototype (Fig. three. 4). MacWhite, writing twelve years later, disagreed with Breuil’s interpretation. Having outlined his Galician kind of rock paintings, he exclusive it from the artwork present in megalithic tombs (MacWhite 1946). till lately this was once the process that used to be favoured through such a lot commentators. hence Simpson and Thawley (1972) become aware of a similar contrast of their account of the rock carvings linked to unmarried burials in Britain and eire and Shee Twohig additionally emphasises the variations among those teams (1981, 121–3). fresh bills of Atlantic rock paintings probably make extra allowance for an overlap with megalithic paintings. To varied levels Hadingham (1974), Burgess (1990) and 40 —TERMS OF REFERENCE— determine three. four British and Irish rock artwork represented as models of the human determine through Breuil in 1934 Johnston (1993) have all expressed doubts approximately no matter if these kinds have been quite autonomous, however the total goals of those writers are diversified. Hadingham is worried with the origins of open-air rock artwork, while Burgess and Johnston are even more drawn to its total chronology. All this dialogue has been enthusiastic about rock artwork in Britain and eire, yet when there are specific similarities among open-air carvings at various issues —THE CIRCLE AND THE STAG— forty-one determine three. five define distribution of megalithic artwork (after Shee Twohig 1981 and Bueno and Balbín 1992) 42 —TERMS OF REFERENCE— alongside the Atlantic beach, this doesn't practice to the ornament of megalithic tombs. right here there's facts for far better nearby and chronological variety (Fig. three. 5).