Issues rather may still stand the best way that Marxism proposes, yet issues thankfully or regrettably (depending in your perspective) by no means stand the way in which doctrines suggest, yet precisely contrary to them. that's my legislation at the Entropy of Doctrines, simply as silly as any other legislation, like several different legislation it really is jam-packed with holes; there's consistently a few doctrine round that evades it, due to the unceasing efforts of the phallic forms. nonetheless, I by no means used to be an extrovert Marxist, it used to be extra like a Platonic allure, simply because each imaginative and prescient of heaven is inevitably welcome to a soul surrounded through hell. Later I turned a poet. as well as all of the different dirt, i used to be additionally a poet. that implies that i used to be treacherous, choked with nothingness, fantasies and deceit whereas even as I wrote compositions within which I clandestinely tried to say that i used to be anything assorted. What does it suggest to be delicate? every little thing dwelling is delicate. for those who contact a bug with the burning finish of a cigarette, it speedy reacts and with its speedy activities it contributes to the poetic treasury of Weltschmerz. Now, other than health care provider Freud, who's occupying an ever better position at the score record of my hatred, I despise so much poets as incurable hypocrites – as bloated monsters who protest opposed to and go judgment at the issues they do themselves. There, that proves that i'm nonetheless a poet in my soul and in addition an ever higher admirer of general practitioner Freud, simply because then you definitely hate basically no matter what is in you, projected on others, evidently, for the sake of private safeguard. possibly I exaggerated a piece with my judgment of poets. Why could poets be higher scoundrels than every person else? even though, that can not be stated approximately Nietzsche. I hated Nietzsche by surprise, at the start sight. That conceited linguist crammed me with terrible anger from the 1st examining to the final, the Superman! How contemptible! What ontological nonsense! a guy can't be a guy; a guy can't, if we wish to inform the reality, be whatever, and Nietzsche wish to be a Superman. That looked as if it would me to be an indescribable blasphemy of God, in whom i didn't think on the time, incidentally. i've got met a mess of men who have been indoctrinated by means of Nietzsche. And but, Nietzsche used to be enjoyed by way of the Nazis, who're faggots, and faggots love syrupy and bombastic rhetoric. at the least, consider: together with his physiognomy, in particular with the fashion of his moustache, Nietzsche appears undeniably like Stalin, notwithstanding really like a kitsch replica; Stalin used to be incomparably extra good-looking. let alone the adaptation in varieties: Stalin used to be a phallic sort, Nietzsche an oral sort. at the least, he's slowly being forgotten as the international is gaining ever better perception into its nothingness, and his meanderings have gotten ridiculous. The irrational clarification of the key i don't know how somebody can refuse to think that the Savior grew to become water into wine. this present day, there's frequent disbelief that water was once became the best wine on the marriage ceremony in Canaan, regrettably even between alcoholics, that's pitiful simply because even now we have the facility to remodel issues, into anything worse, after all, simply because we're wicked.