And the villains so unmasked are heaped with honors. those that sacrifice their lives and limbs for the sake of justice aren't lauded as heroes. They’re vilified as delinquent nitwits. The so-called “problem” of Evil is exactly the results of our 2000-year previous Xtian insistence that God is infinitely ideal. Gautama was once correct. the realm is a vale of tears. The Gnostic author, being imperfect, created a less than perfect international and it’s time we confronted it. Evil magic is predicated on a department of Self and global and the belief that what's reliable for the Self is all that concerns. solid magic relies at the figuring out that Self and international are one. for this reason what's solid for the realm is immediately sturdy for the Self. clever notwithstanding that sounds at the floor, it’s illogical and quantities to wishful considering. What’s stable for the top isn’t inevitably solid for the ft and what’s sturdy for the area isn’t consistently strong for the self. Exploiters of evil are fast to indicate the dangers of self-sacrifice and altruism. The depraved prosper simply because Evil is ignorant and any improvement of the ego, being an act of lack of understanding, instantly rides over doubt. hence egotism propels itself ahead with self assurance. Egolessness, nevertheless, missing self-assurance, falters and is exploited. So we come again to phrases. phantasm, lack of information and darkness are only synonyms for the Ego, whose major activity is to guard the physique from destruction. Enlightenment is a synonym for the removal of the ego and the relinquishment of its defense. From a materialistic standpoint, for this reason, the services of fine and Evil are reversed. it is just the hugely complicated, non secular realizing that accepts loss of life, no longer only as inevitable, yet as a wierd paradox: “the non-existence of non-existence. ” What we suggest through “advanced religious knowing” is the popularity that when you consider that loss of life can also be an phantasm, then there relatively isn't any “separation” of self from different. we actually are crucibles for the trying out of personality. If we keep our materialistic selfishness, we’re heaped with worldly rewards. If we continue our religion in self-denial, we earn injustice, if no longer crucifixion. reliable can triumph in the world provided that the Self relatively does gain extra from its connection to the realm than from its separation. So we need to movement past stable and Evil, to the area past the realm and to the Self past the self, to the final word paradoxical fact: the single self that concerns is the “individual,” or that very idiosyncrasy which keeps the most powerful expression of self in the context of “World” or “Other. ” Self attracts energy, in different phrases, no longer from id, yet from distinction. which means if we wish to elevate the self to the next point, we by some means need to bring up the realm first. Archimedes can do not anything in an anthill. The materialist, nonetheless, caring merely along with his isolation, sees the area in a parasitic model, strictly as his life-support procedure. therefore Evil stands published as self-preoccupation on the price of the realm and reliable because the Self striving to be an enhancement of the realm.