Blanc runs after politics, and socialism is searching for technology. not more hypocrisy, enable me say to M. Blanc: you want neither Catholicism nor monarchy nor the Aristocracy, yet you need to have a God, a faith, a dictatorship, a censorship, a hierarchy, differences, and ranks. in my opinion, I deny your God, your authority, your sovereignty, your judicial kingdom, and your whole consultant mystifications; i need neither Robespierre's censer nor Marat's rod; and, instead of undergo your androgynous democracy, i'd help the established order. For 16 years your social gathering has resisted growth and blocked opinion; for 16 years it has proven its despotic foundation through following within the wake of strength on the extremity of the left centre: it's time for it to abdicate or suffer a transformation. Implacable theorists of authority, what then do you plan which the govt -264upon that you make struggle can't accomplish in a manner extra tolerable than yours? M. Blanc's procedure should be summarized in 3 issues: 1. to offer energy an exceptional strength of initiative, -- that's, in simple English, to make absolutism all-powerful so one can observe a utopia. 2. to set up public workshops, and provide them with capital, on the State's rate. three. To extinguish inner most by means of the contest of nationwide undefined. and that's all. Has M. Blanc touched the matter of price, which includes in itself on my own all others? He doesn't even suspect its life. Has he given a idea of distribution? No. Has he solved the antinomy of the department of work, perpetual reason for the workingman's lack of expertise, immorality, and poverty? No. Has he triggered the contradiction of equipment and wages to vanish, and reconciled the rights of asso-ciation with these of liberty? to the contrary, M. Blanc consecrates this contradiction. lower than the despotic security of the kingdom, he admits in precept the inequality of ranks and wages, including thereto, as reimbursement, the poll. aren't workingmen who vote their laws and pick their leaders loose? it could actually potentially take place that those vote casting workingmen will admit no command or distinction of pay between them: then, as not anything could have been supplied for the pride of business capacities, whereas protecting political equality, dissolution will penetrate into the workshop, and, within the absence of police intervention, each one will go back to his personal affairs. those fears appear to M. Blanc neither severe nor well-founded: he awaits the try frivolously, very certain that society won't exit of his strategy to contradict him. -265And such complicated and complex questions as these of tax-ation, credits, overseas exchange, estate, heredity, -- has M. Blanc fathomed them? Has he solved the matter of inhabitants? No, no, no, 1000 instances no: while M. Blanc can't clear up an issue, he removes it. concerning inhabitants, he says: As purely poverty is prolific, and because the social workshop will reason poverty to vanish, there's no explanation for giving it any idea. In useless does M. de Sismondi, supported through common ex-perience, cry out to him: we haven't any self assurance in those that workout delegated powers.